Skip to content

feat(core,miner): implement EIP-7934 - RLP execution block size limit #31990#2237

Open
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:EIP-7934
Open

feat(core,miner): implement EIP-7934 - RLP execution block size limit #31990#2237
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:EIP-7934

Conversation

@gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed changes

Ref: ethereum#31990

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Changes that don't change source code or tests
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • revert: Revert something
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Impacted Components

Which parts of the codebase does this PR touch?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Tested on a private network from the genesis block and monitored the chain operating correctly for multiple epochs.
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 26, 2026 11:30
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ab479e7d-d46d-49bc-93e8-4a2ffc47083e

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Implements the EIP-7934 RLP-encoded block size cap (activated at Osaka) by introducing a protocol constant, enforcing the cap during block validation, and adding miner-side packing heuristics plus a regression test.

Changes:

  • Add params.MaxBlockSize protocol constant for the maximum RLP-encoded block size.
  • Enforce oversized block rejection in core.BlockValidator.ValidateBody (Osaka+).
  • Add miner-side transaction packing limit and a unit test covering oversized block validation at the Osaka fork boundary.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
params/protocol_params.go Adds MaxBlockSize protocol constant used for the new cap.
core/error.go Introduces ErrBlockOversized for block-size validation failures.
core/block_validator.go Enforces the RLP block size cap from Osaka onward.
core/block_validator_test.go Adds a test ensuring oversized blocks are rejected only post-Osaka.
miner/worker.go Tracks approximate assembled size and stops including txs when near the cap.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

miner/worker.go Outdated
Comment on lines +1215 to +1224
// Stop packing when the next tx would exceed the miner-side block size
// threshold.
if !w.txFitsSize(tx) {
// Stop considering this tx if it would exceed the miner-side block size
// threshold, and move on to the next candidate.
if !w.txFitsSize(tx) {
log.Debug("Skipping oversized transaction", "hash", tx.Hash(), "size", tx.Size())
txs.Pop()
continue
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new oversized-tx guard block has a duplicated if !w.txFitsSize(tx) and mismatched indentation/bracing (nested if without closing the first). As written, this section won’t compile and the intended control-flow (skip/pop and continue) is unclear. Please collapse to a single size check with correct braces and indentation.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
miner/worker.go Outdated
Comment on lines +116 to +123
// txFits reports whether the transaction fits into the block size limit.
func (w *Work) txFitsSize(tx *types.Transaction) bool {
// this Osaka-specific cap is not enforced pre-fork
if w.config.IsOsaka(w.header.Number) {
return w.size+tx.Size() < params.MaxBlockSize-maxBlockSizeBufferZone
}
return true
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Work.size is used to enforce an RLP-encoded block size cap, but it’s initialized from header.Size(), which (per its doc) is an approximate memory usage metric (common.StorageSize), not the header’s RLP-encoded byte length. Mixing that with tx.Size() (RLP size) makes the size accounting misleading and may be either overly conservative or inaccurate. Consider initializing/tracking size using RLP-encoded sizes (e.g., encode header once to get its RLP length, or track only tx-bytes and rename the field to reflect that it’s an estimate).

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines 1097 to +1101
for _, tx := range specialTxs {
if !w.txFitsSize(tx) {
log.Debug("Skipping oversized transaction", "hash", tx.Hash(), "size", tx.Size())
continue
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 26, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Miner-side enforcement of the new Osaka block-size cap isn’t covered by tests in this PR. Since miner/worker_test.go exists and this change affects transaction selection behavior, please add a unit test that activates Osaka and asserts oversized transactions are skipped (and that normal-sized transactions are still included).

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@gzliudan gzliudan force-pushed the EIP-7934 branch 3 times, most recently from c1dab06 to 2819ebc Compare March 26, 2026 17:11
@gzliudan gzliudan requested a review from Copilot March 26, 2026 17:12
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants