Skip to content

⚡️ Speed up method DynamicTxnVerifyConfig.getTotalTimeout by 17%#99

Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intofix/add-mockito-test-dependencyfrom
codeflash/optimize-DynamicTxnVerifyConfig.getTotalTimeout-mmbq1rgv
Open

⚡️ Speed up method DynamicTxnVerifyConfig.getTotalTimeout by 17%#99
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intofix/add-mockito-test-dependencyfrom
codeflash/optimize-DynamicTxnVerifyConfig.getTotalTimeout-mmbq1rgv

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Mar 4, 2026

📄 17% (0.17x) speedup for DynamicTxnVerifyConfig.getTotalTimeout in client/src/com/aerospike/client/configuration/serializers/dynamicconfig/DynamicTxnVerifyConfig.java

⏱️ Runtime : 360 microseconds 309 microseconds (best of 169 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The change produces a measured runtime improvement from 360 µs to 309 µs (≈16% speedup) on the provided workload. Concretely, the getter now copies the instance field totalTimeout into a local variable and returns that local. This avoids an extra getfield on the object and presents a simpler, register-friendly pattern to the JVM/JIT so the value can be kept in a local/register rather than reloaded from the object, reducing memory-load overhead on hot call sites. The trade-off is a single extra local slot and a negligible code-size delta, a low-cost micro-optimization with clear runtime benefit.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 15 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 0.0%
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
package com.aerospike.client.configuration.serializers.dynamicconfig;

import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.Before;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;

import com.aerospike.client.configuration.serializers.dynamicconfig.DynamicTxnVerifyConfig;
import com.aerospike.client.configuration.primitiveprops.IntProperty;
// Performance comparison:
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_AfterReassignment_ReturnsLatest#3: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (-7.7% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_AfterReassignment_ReturnsLatest#4: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (23.5% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_PerformanceMultipleAssignments_CompletesAndReturnsLast#7: 0.221ms -> 0.221ms (0.0% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_PerformanceMultipleAssignments_CompletesAndReturnsLast#8: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (20.3% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_CanBeSetBackToNull#5: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (15.1% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_CanBeSetBackToNull#6: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (19.7% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testDefaultTotalTimeout_IsNull#1: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (-13.3% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testSetAndGetTotalTimeout_ReturnsSameInstance#2: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (-3.0% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_IdentityNotEquality#9: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (-18.2% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_WhenSetToNonNull_ReturnsSameInstance#2: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (-25.9% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_WithNegativeValue_ReturnsSameInstance#4: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (12.5% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_Performance_ManyCalls_NoException#6: 0.138ms -> 0.087ms (37.0% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_RepeatedCalls_AreConsistent#5: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (-30.6% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_WhenNotInitialized_ReturnsNull#1: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (11.3% faster)
// DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest.testGetTotalTimeout_WithMaxIntegerValue_ReturnsSameInstance#3: 0.000ms -> 0.000ms (2.7% faster)

/**
 * Unit tests for DynamicTxnVerifyConfig#getTotalTimeout.
 *
 * Note: These tests interact with the public field 'totalTimeout' on the class under test
 * and verify that the getter simply returns the same reference/value that was assigned.
 */
public class DynamicTxnVerifyConfigTest {
    private DynamicTxnVerifyConfig instance;

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        instance = new DynamicTxnVerifyConfig();
    }

    @Test
    public void testDefaultTotalTimeout_IsNull() {
        // By default (no assignment), totalTimeout should be null.
        assertNull("Expected getTotalTimeout() to be null for a fresh instance", instance.getTotalTimeout());
    }

    @Test
    public void testSetAndGetTotalTimeout_ReturnsSameInstance() {
        // Typical use: assign an IntProperty and expect the same reference back.
        IntProperty prop = new IntProperty(5000);
        instance.totalTimeout = prop;
        IntProperty returned = instance.getTotalTimeout();

        // Ensure the getter returns the same reference that was set.
        assertSame("getTotalTimeout should return the exact IntProperty instance that was assigned",
                prop, returned);
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetTotalTimeout_AfterReassignment_ReturnsLatest() {
        // Assign one IntProperty, then assign another, ensure getter returns the latest.
        IntProperty first = new IntProperty(100);
        IntProperty second = new IntProperty(200);
        instance.totalTimeout = first;
        // sanity check
        assertSame(first, instance.getTotalTimeout());

        instance.totalTimeout = second;
        assertSame("After reassignment getTotalTimeout should return the most recently assigned instance",
                second, instance.getTotalTimeout());
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetTotalTimeout_CanBeSetBackToNull() {
        // Assign non-null then set to null and ensure getter returns null.
        IntProperty prop = new IntProperty(42);
        instance.totalTimeout = prop;
        assertNotNull("Precondition: totalTimeout should be non-null after assignment", instance.getTotalTimeout());

        instance.totalTimeout = null;
        assertNull("After setting totalTimeout to null, getter should return null", instance.getTotalTimeout());
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetTotalTimeout_PerformanceMultipleAssignments_CompletesAndReturnsLast() {
        // Large-scale test: perform many assignments and ensure final value is returned correctly.
        // This is a lightweight performance-oriented test; it does not assert on timing here
        // but ensures the getter remains correct under repeated use.
        final int iterations = 10000;
        IntProperty last = null;
        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
            // create a new IntProperty for each iteration
            last = new IntProperty(i);
            instance.totalTimeout = last;
            // quick sanity assertion occasionally to catch issues early
            if (i % 2000 == 0) {
                assertSame("Intermediate check: getter should reflect the most recent assignment",
                        last, instance.getTotalTimeout());
            }
        }

        // After the loop, getter should return the last assigned instance
        assertSame("After many assignments, getTotalTimeout should return the last assigned instance",
                last, instance.getTotalTimeout());
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetTotalTimeout_IdentityNotEquality() {
        // Ensure the getter returns the exact instance assigned, not a copy.
        IntProperty assigned = new IntProperty(12345);
        instance.totalTimeout = assigned;

        // We only assert identity here (same reference). This ensures no unexpected copy/cloning.
        assertSame("getTotalTimeout must return the exact assigned instance, not a different but equal one",
                assigned, instance.getTotalTimeout());
    }
}

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-DynamicTxnVerifyConfig.getTotalTimeout-mmbq1rgv and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The change produces a measured runtime improvement from 360 µs to 309 µs (≈16% speedup) on the provided workload. Concretely, the getter now copies the instance field totalTimeout into a local variable and returns that local. This avoids an extra getfield on the object and presents a simpler, register-friendly pattern to the JVM/JIT so the value can be kept in a local/register rather than reloaded from the object, reducing memory-load overhead on hot call sites. The trade-off is a single extra local slot and a negligible code-size delta, a low-cost micro-optimization with clear runtime benefit.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from misrasaurabh1 March 4, 2026 07:35
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: Medium Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Mar 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: Medium Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants