Updated brand colours.

[AlexSkrypnyk]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Updated brand color palette for both light and dark themes — refreshed primary, secondary, and tertiary brand colors (six values changed) to improve visual consistency and contrast across the application.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d5f20d42-ec45-4db4-9ff0-61b6d0c84d41

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 398920c and 93f5967.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• composer.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• composer.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates two areas: (1) brand color hex values in the design system Sass map for both light and dark themes; (2) dependency version constraint bumps in composer.json. No behavioral or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Theme Brand Colors web/themes/custom/drevops/components/variables.base.scss	Modified the $ct-colors-brands Sass map: updated hex values for brand1, brand2, and brand3 in both light and dark branches (6 color replacements).
Composer dependencies composer.json	Bumped multiple dependency version constraints (require and require-dev). No code logic changes; only manifest/version updates.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Updated core and dependencies. #133 — Also modifies composer.json dependency version constraints; likely related vendor/version update overlap.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The PR title 'Updated brand colours' accurately describes the primary change in the changeset: updating color values in the brand color palette within the SCSS variables file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/update-colours

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@web/themes/custom/drevops/components/variables.base.scss`:
- Around line 17-24: Update the PR by running WCAG contrast and visual
regression checks for the theme color tokens defined in variables.base.scss —
specifically the 'light' and 'dark' maps and their 'brand1', 'brand2', 'brand3'
entries — across impacted UI surfaces (text on brand backgrounds, buttons,
links). Use an automated contrast checker (e.g., axe-core, pa11y, or Lighthouse)
and a visual regression tool (e.g., Percy, Chromatic, or Playwright snapshots)
to validate both themes; if any checks fail, adjust the token values in the
'light'/'dark' maps or update component styles to meet AA/AAA thresholds and
attach failing screenshots/diffs and updated token changes to the PR for
reviewer verification.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 106146a2-7dcd-48fb-900e-19049fabd64d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7463c54 and 398920c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• web/themes/custom/drevops/components/variables.base.scss

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Run contrast/visual regression checks for both themes before merge.

Given these are core brand tokens, please validate impacted UI surfaces (e.g., text on brand backgrounds, buttons, links) for WCAG contrast in light and dark themes.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@web/themes/custom/drevops/components/variables.base.scss` around lines 17 -
24, Update the PR by running WCAG contrast and visual regression checks for the
theme color tokens defined in variables.base.scss — specifically the 'light' and
'dark' maps and their 'brand1', 'brand2', 'brand3' entries — across impacted UI
surfaces (text on brand backgrounds, buttons, links). Use an automated contrast
checker (e.g., axe-core, pa11y, or Lighthouse) and a visual regression tool
(e.g., Percy, Chromatic, or Playwright snapshots) to validate both themes; if
any checks fail, adjust the token values in the 'light'/'dark' maps or update
component styles to meet AA/AAA thresholds and attach failing screenshots/diffs
and updated token changes to the PR for reviewer verification.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Report:
  2026-03-13 23:53:56

 Summary:
  Classes: 50.00% (5/10)
  Methods: 73.91% (17/23)
  Lines:   92.77% (308/332)

Drupal\do_feed\FeedUrlBuilder
  Methods: 100.00% ( 4/ 4)   Lines: 100.00% ( 18/ 18)
Drupal\do_feed\Form\FeedSettingsForm
  Methods: 100.00% ( 4/ 4)   Lines: 100.00% ( 15/ 15)
Drupal\do_feed\Hook\EntityDeleteHook
  Methods:  50.00% ( 1/ 2)   Lines:  92.31% ( 12/ 13)
Drupal\do_feed\Hook\EntityPresaveHook
  Methods: 100.00% ( 4/ 4)   Lines: 100.00% ( 54/ 54)
Drupal\do_feed\Hook\PreprocessParagraphHook
  Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2)   Lines: 100.00% ( 14/ 14)
Drupal\do_feed\Hook\PreprocessViewsViewRowRssHook
  Methods: 100.00% ( 1/ 1)   Lines: 100.00% (  3/  3)
Drupal\do_feed\Hook\ViewsPreViewHook
  Methods:  50.00% ( 1/ 2)   Lines:  96.43% ( 27/ 28)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.73%. Comparing base (7463c54) to head (93f5967).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #152   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    87.73%   87.73%           
========================================
  Files           11       11           
  Lines          163      163           
========================================
  Hits           143      143           
  Misses          20       20           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.