Update nuspec to place library under nano TFM

[Copilot]

NuGet package files were being placed under lib\ instead of the correct lib\netnano1.0\, and the dependency was not scoped to the .NETnanoFramework1.0 target framework.

Changes

• Dependencies: Wrapped nanoFramework.CoreLibrary in a <group targetFramework=".NETnanoFramework1.0"> element
• Files: Replaced 5 individual file entries (.dll, .pdb, .pdbx, .pe, .xml) with a single wildcard entry targeting lib\netnano1.0

<!-- Before -->
<dependencies>
  <dependency id="nanoFramework.CoreLibrary" version="1.17.11" />
</dependencies>
<files>
  <file src="...\System.Math.dll" target="lib\System.Math.dll" />
  <file src="...\System.Math.pdbx" target="lib\System.Math.pdbx" />
  <!-- ... -->
</files>

<!-- After -->
<dependencies>
  <group targetFramework=".NETnanoFramework1.0">
    <dependency id="nanoFramework.CoreLibrary" version="1.17.11" />
  </group>
</dependencies>
<files>
  <file src="nanoFramework.System.Math\bin\Release\System.Math.*" target="lib\netnano1.0" />
  <!-- ... -->
</files>

Original prompt

---

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>Update nuspec to place library under nano TFM</issue_title>
<issue_description>### Details about task
Most of the nuspec files are not using the correct location to place the files.
Files (DLL, PE, PDBX and XML for IntelliSense) should be placed under "lib\netnano1.0" (currently are being placed under "lib" only.
Also they should declare a dependency group for ".NETnanoFramework1.0" target framework.
At the same time those still naming the various file types should use a wildcard instead (e.g. "...\Release\mscorlib.*).
The correct pattern should be (take this nuspec as sample):
nanoframework/System.Device.Adc@aab7bca

Do not change anything else on the nuspec file.

Make this change against develop branch.

Description

</issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)

• Fixes Update nuspec to place library under nano TFM Home#1710

---

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud