Skip to content

OCPCLOUD-3372: Use centralized tls profile for webhook tls#434

Draft
damdo wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
damdo:use-centralized-tls-profile-webhook-tls
Draft

OCPCLOUD-3372: Use centralized tls profile for webhook tls#434
damdo wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
damdo:use-centralized-tls-profile-webhook-tls

Conversation

@damdo
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo commented Feb 12, 2026

Stacked on top of #433

To be tested in tandem with: openshift/cloud-provider-aws#127

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 12, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 12, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign racheljpg for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@damdo damdo force-pushed the use-centralized-tls-profile-webhook-tls branch from 3a687ea to 2fe20f7 Compare February 14, 2026 10:58
@damdo damdo force-pushed the use-centralized-tls-profile-webhook-tls branch from 2fe20f7 to 385dfec Compare February 14, 2026 15:20
@damdo damdo changed the title DNM: WIP: Use centralized tls profile webhook tls DNM: WIP: Use centralized tls profile for webhook tls Feb 17, 2026
@damdo damdo changed the title DNM: WIP: Use centralized tls profile for webhook tls OCPCLOUD-3372: Use centralized tls profile for webhook tls Mar 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 20, 2026

@damdo: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-3372 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Stacked on top of #433

To be tested in tandem with: openshift/cloud-provider-aws#127

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
  • do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f74d5093-85d6-4f19-b076-e1471b2a1809

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 20, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 20, 2026

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants