Prepare for OTP29

[NelsonVides]

Mostly issues around deprecating catch expressions. Also a warning around the is_record bif and deprecated export from subexpression warning (the new filtermap).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 62.50000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.39%. Comparing base (f511d29) to head (88ea3fb).
⚠️ Report is 13 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/proper_statem.erl	62.50%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #327      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.27%   85.39%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        4590     4600      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         3914     3928      +14     
+ Misses        676      672       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[NelsonVides]

Actually I just noticed that #324 does pretty much the same and it's actually kinda cleaner, I like that one better 😄
Looking forward for a new OTP29-ready release 🥹

There's also the option to add latest to the CI matrix, in case we'd want to verify this in CI as well.

[kostis]

Thanks for your PR and your comment. I agree with you that #324 is a cleaner PR, so we'll probably go with that.

There's also the option to add latest to the CI matrix, in case we'd want to verify this in CI as well.

Yes, we should definitely verify this in the CI - that's the point in having one. However, AFAIK Erlang/OTP 29 is not yet released. Does latest also consider pre-releases as latest candidates?

[NelsonVides]

Yes, latest includes release candidates: https://github.com/erlef/setup-beam?tab=readme-ov-file#latest-versions 🙂

I can't push to the other PR, but maybe we want to add that configuration to the CI matrix and get the other one merged? I'm closing this in the meantime in favour of #324 💪🏽