Skip to content

If there are too many suggestions for malformed attribute, do not suggest them#149917

Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
GuillaumeGomez:malformed-attribute-suggestions
Dec 12, 2025
Merged

If there are too many suggestions for malformed attribute, do not suggest them#149917
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
GuillaumeGomez:malformed-attribute-suggestions

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Dec 12, 2025

Part of #149865.

This not only covers for doc attributes but for all attributes, so don't hesitate to tell me if you want it to be limited to only doc attributes (although I think it's actually a nice improvement overall).

Also, I picked 3 as the maximum number of suggestions before it becomes noise, but it's very much open to debate.

r? @JonathanBrouwer

@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 12, 2025

This PR modifies tests/ui/issues/. If this PR is adding new tests to tests/ui/issues/,
please refrain from doing so, and instead add it to more descriptive subdirectories.

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 12, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez force-pushed the malformed-attribute-suggestions branch from c424cd9 to d025cde Compare December 12, 2025 13:55
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r=me when CI is green

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 12, 2025

📌 Commit d025cde has been approved by JonathanBrouwer

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 12, 2025
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
…-suggestions, r=JonathanBrouwer

If there are too many suggestions for malformed attribute, do not suggest them

Part of rust-lang#149865.

This not only covers for doc attributes but for all attributes, so don't hesitate to tell me if you want it to be limited to only doc attributes (although I think it's actually a nice improvement overall).

Also, I picked 3 as the maximum number of suggestions before it becomes noise, but it's very much open to debate.

r? `@JonathanBrouwer`
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

This one will likely break when put in a rollup so:

@bors p=1 rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 12, 2025

⌛ Testing commit d025cde with merge fa5eda1...

@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 12, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: JonathanBrouwer
Pushing fa5eda1 to main...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 12, 2025
@bors bors merged commit fa5eda1 into rust-lang:main Dec 12, 2025
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 12, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 3391c01 (parent) -> fa5eda1 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 2 test diffs

2 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard fa5eda19b95201468f5b1c5c035ec2fc06fccd66 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. dist-apple-various: 3173.3s -> 4078.6s (+28.5%)
  2. dist-x86_64-musl: 7798.6s -> 6920.8s (-11.3%)
  3. dist-aarch64-apple: 7453.6s -> 6693.0s (-10.2%)
  4. aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-2: 2504.9s -> 2251.0s (-10.1%)
  5. x86_64-msvc-2: 6779.2s -> 7433.7s (+9.7%)
  6. dist-x86_64-illumos: 5916.6s -> 6356.9s (+7.4%)
  7. dist-x86_64-llvm-mingw: 7217.7s -> 7736.1s (+7.2%)
  8. aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-1: 3639.5s -> 3378.5s (-7.2%)
  9. x86_64-gnu-llvm-20: 2643.4s -> 2822.9s (+6.8%)
  10. x86_64-gnu-aux: 6588.2s -> 7027.9s (+6.7%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fa5eda1): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -0.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.9% [-0.9%, -0.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (secondary -2.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.2%, -2.0%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 473.663s -> 473.976s (0.07%)
Artifact size: 389.32 MiB -> 389.30 MiB (-0.00%)

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the malformed-attribute-suggestions branch December 13, 2025 10:24
@estebank
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

estebank commented Mar 30, 2026

I just noticed this and the suggestion machinery already restricts the rendering to the top 4. I am looking at alternative ways of winnowing the number of suggestions by looking at the parts of the existing attribute that were correct already and only include those that change things that need changing. Maybe it would have made sense to provide a link to the docs if we are not presenting a suggestion.

Noticed while doing #154605

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants